3
as either necessary or, in fact, possible to lay
down such restrictions as regards the share-
holding of public companies, but the existing
restrictions on the shareholding of private
companies renders them amenable to regulation,
and the companies which have caused most trouble
have, in fact, practically all been private
companies. It would be easy to insist that the
majority of shareholders and of capital in such
companies should be British in the case of
companies operating in China, this in addition
to the other requirements of British companies
operating elsewhere.
The new
It is suggested that Section 194 should
be replaced by a section dealing with all
British companies operating in China.
section should follow the lines of Section 200.
which deals with the operation in China of
companies limited by guarantee, i.e. a necessary
condition shall be the consent of the Minister.
It is argued in favour of this proposal that it
puts adequate control on a legal basis, and yet
leaves room for elasticity in operation,
discretion resting with the Minister, and also
obviates the difficulties which have hitherto
been experienced as regards companies incorporated
elsewhere than in Shanghai. Further, the
difficulty of the conflict of jurisdiction with
the Chinese authorities would disappear, as
those companies over which His Majesty's
Government would not wish to assume jurisdiction
under this provisions
would not, in the operations of the revised
Section 194, be permitted to operate in China
at all.
The
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.